<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Troubleshooting Lab #6</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.alwaysthenetwork.com/troubleshooting-labs/troubleshooting-lab-6/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.alwaysthenetwork.com/troubleshooting-labs/troubleshooting-lab-6/</link>
	<description>Just another Cisco blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 23:37:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Olu</title>
		<link>http://blog.alwaysthenetwork.com/troubleshooting-labs/troubleshooting-lab-6/comment-page-1/#comment-1136</link>
		<dc:creator>Olu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 11:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.alwaysthenetwork.com/?p=822#comment-1136</guid>
		<description>The config files are not there !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The config files are not there !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colby</title>
		<link>http://blog.alwaysthenetwork.com/troubleshooting-labs/troubleshooting-lab-6/comment-page-1/#comment-788</link>
		<dc:creator>Colby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 17:34:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.alwaysthenetwork.com/?p=822#comment-788</guid>
		<description>Too many routers? Have you seen the IE troubleshooting section? Supposed to be more routers than this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too many routers? Have you seen the IE troubleshooting section? Supposed to be more routers than this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: loggi</title>
		<link>http://blog.alwaysthenetwork.com/troubleshooting-labs/troubleshooting-lab-6/comment-page-1/#comment-787</link>
		<dc:creator>loggi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 17:14:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.alwaysthenetwork.com/?p=822#comment-787</guid>
		<description>pls don&#039;t die on us</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pls don&#8217;t die on us</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: loggi</title>
		<link>http://blog.alwaysthenetwork.com/troubleshooting-labs/troubleshooting-lab-6/comment-page-1/#comment-786</link>
		<dc:creator>loggi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 17:12:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.alwaysthenetwork.com/?p=822#comment-786</guid>
		<description>too many routers for the lab 6 troubleshooting, try making a lot less, 
bgp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>too many routers for the lab 6 troubleshooting, try making a lot less,<br />
bgp</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colby</title>
		<link>http://blog.alwaysthenetwork.com/troubleshooting-labs/troubleshooting-lab-6/comment-page-1/#comment-665</link>
		<dc:creator>Colby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 18:18:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.alwaysthenetwork.com/?p=822#comment-665</guid>
		<description>Good job Stuey. Sucks no one else even attempted it. I still have no idea why.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good job Stuey. Sucks no one else even attempted it. I still have no idea why.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colby</title>
		<link>http://blog.alwaysthenetwork.com/troubleshooting-labs/troubleshooting-lab-6/comment-page-1/#comment-640</link>
		<dc:creator>Colby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 15:02:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.alwaysthenetwork.com/?p=822#comment-640</guid>
		<description>Is it too hard? Too many routers? Give me some feedback. None of the regulars are attempting/posting. :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it too hard? Too many routers? Give me some feedback. None of the regulars are attempting/posting. <img src='http://blog.alwaysthenetwork.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart Howlette</title>
		<link>http://blog.alwaysthenetwork.com/troubleshooting-labs/troubleshooting-lab-6/comment-page-1/#comment-635</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart Howlette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 15:21:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.alwaysthenetwork.com/?p=822#comment-635</guid>
		<description>Some other people better attempt this, I want to know how hilariously wrong I am!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some other people better attempt this, I want to know how hilariously wrong I am!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colby</title>
		<link>http://blog.alwaysthenetwork.com/troubleshooting-labs/troubleshooting-lab-6/comment-page-1/#comment-632</link>
		<dc:creator>Colby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 23:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.alwaysthenetwork.com/?p=822#comment-632</guid>
		<description>Only ONE attempt so far guys? You&#039;re killing me!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only ONE attempt so far guys? You&#8217;re killing me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart Howlette</title>
		<link>http://blog.alwaysthenetwork.com/troubleshooting-labs/troubleshooting-lab-6/comment-page-1/#comment-631</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart Howlette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 14:05:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.alwaysthenetwork.com/?p=822#comment-631</guid>
		<description>I think I&#039;ve found the problem.

If we do a sh ip bgp on PE2

*&gt;i87.3.85.0/24     1.1.1.1                  0    100      0 7000 i
*                   39.12.73.2                             0 8000 7000 i

We see two routes for the network, and its preference is to go via the 1.1.1.1 router (which is PE1). The reason for this is because it has less AS&#039;s to go through (traversing its own AS of 6500 and 7000, rather than going via its own AS, 8000 and 7000). Despite the fact that there are less hops physically, it&#039;ll prefer the least AS paths due to BGPs route selection process.

So that at least points to why its not going to Peer 2 to get to Peer 1.

Now, on PE1, when routes come back to be able to find the original destination, theres one little problem -

ip route vrf Ca 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.2.1.7

Compared to on PE2 -

ip route vrf Ca 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.2.1.7
ip route vrf Cb 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.3.1.5

So the replies are not by default going to the 10.3.1.5 address

sh ip ro vrf Cb &#124; i 172.16.40.0
B       172.16.40.0 [200/2297856] via 2.2.2.2, 01:52:20

It wants to go via 2.2.2.2, but it has no route to get to that, as the default route is not there, and its not in its own routing table.

I could be miles off with this one, but thats about the only thing I could work out :S</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I&#8217;ve found the problem.</p>
<p>If we do a sh ip bgp on PE2</p>
<p>*&gt;i87.3.85.0/24     1.1.1.1                  0    100      0 7000 i<br />
*                   39.12.73.2                             0 8000 7000 i</p>
<p>We see two routes for the network, and its preference is to go via the 1.1.1.1 router (which is PE1). The reason for this is because it has less AS&#8217;s to go through (traversing its own AS of 6500 and 7000, rather than going via its own AS, 8000 and 7000). Despite the fact that there are less hops physically, it&#8217;ll prefer the least AS paths due to BGPs route selection process.</p>
<p>So that at least points to why its not going to Peer 2 to get to Peer 1.</p>
<p>Now, on PE1, when routes come back to be able to find the original destination, theres one little problem -</p>
<p>ip route vrf Ca 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.2.1.7</p>
<p>Compared to on PE2 -</p>
<p>ip route vrf Ca 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.2.1.7<br />
ip route vrf Cb 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.3.1.5</p>
<p>So the replies are not by default going to the 10.3.1.5 address</p>
<p>sh ip ro vrf Cb | i 172.16.40.0<br />
B       172.16.40.0 [200/2297856] via 2.2.2.2, 01:52:20</p>
<p>It wants to go via 2.2.2.2, but it has no route to get to that, as the default route is not there, and its not in its own routing table.</p>
<p>I could be miles off with this one, but thats about the only thing I could work out :S</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

